Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Chest ; 159(3): 1076-1083, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32991873

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic may require rationing of various medical resources if demand exceeds supply. Theoretical frameworks for resource allocation have provided much needed ethical guidance, but hospitals still need to address objective practicalities and legal vetting to operationalize scarce resource allocation schemata. To develop operational scarce resource allocation processes for public health catastrophes, including the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, five health systems in Maryland formed a consortium-with diverse expertise and representation-representing more than half of all hospitals in the state. Our efforts built on a prior statewide community engagement process that determined the values and moral reference points of citizens and health-care professionals regarding the allocation of ventilators during a public health catastrophe. Through a partnership of health systems, we developed a scarce resource allocation framework informed by citizens' values and by general expert consensus. Allocation schema for mechanical ventilators, ICU resources, blood components, novel therapeutics, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and renal replacement therapies were developed. Creating operational algorithms for each resource posed unique challenges; each resource's varying nature and underlying data on benefit prevented any single algorithm from being universally applicable. The development of scarce resource allocation processes must be iterative, legally vetted, and tested. We offer our processes to assist other regions that may be faced with the challenge of rationing health-care resources during public health catastrophes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Civil Defense/organization & administration , Health Care Rationing , Health Workforce , Public Health/trends , Resource Allocation , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/therapy , Change Management , Disaster Planning , Health Care Rationing/methods , Health Care Rationing/standards , Humans , Intersectoral Collaboration , Maryland/epidemiology , Resource Allocation/ethics , Resource Allocation/organization & administration , SARS-CoV-2 , Triage/ethics , Triage/organization & administration
2.
J Appl Physiol (1985) ; 102(2): 547-56, 2007 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17008440

ABSTRACT

Obstructive sleep apnea is caused by pharyngeal occlusion due to alterations in upper airway mechanical properties and/or disturbances in neuromuscular control. The objective of the study was to determine the relative contribution of mechanical loads and dynamic neuromuscular responses to pharyngeal collapse during sleep. Sixteen obstructive sleep apnea patients and sixteen normal subjects were matched on age, sex, and body mass index. Pharyngeal collapsibility, defined by the critical pressure, was measured during sleep. The critical pressure was partitioned between its passive mechanical properties (passive critical pressure) and active dynamic responses to upper airway obstruction (active critical pressure). Compared with normal subjects, sleep apnea patients demonstrated elevated mechanical loads as demonstrated by higher passive critical pressures [-0.05 (SD 2.4) vs. -4.5 cmH2O (SD 3.0), P = 0.0003]. Dynamic responses were depressed in sleep apnea patients, as suggested by failure to lower their active critical pressures [-1.6 (SD 3.5) vs. -11.1 cmH2O (SD 5.3), P < 0.0001] in response to upper airway obstruction. Moreover, elevated mechanical loads placed some normal individuals at risk for sleep apnea. In this subset, dynamic responses to upper airway obstruction compensated for mechanical loads and maintained airway patency by lowering the active critical pressure. The present study suggests that increased mechanical loads and blunted neuromuscular responses are both required for the development of obstructive sleep apnea.


Subject(s)
Neuromuscular Junction/physiology , Respiratory Mechanics/physiology , Respiratory System/physiopathology , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/physiopathology , Adult , Biomechanical Phenomena , Case-Control Studies , Continuous Positive Airway Pressure , Electromyography , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pharynx/physiopathology , Polysomnography , Respiratory Muscles/innervation , Respiratory Muscles/physiopathology , Respiratory System/innervation , Risk Factors , Sleep/physiology , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/etiology
3.
J Appl Physiol (1985) ; 101(5): 1489-94, 2006 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16825526

ABSTRACT

To examine the dynamic modulation of upper airway (UA) function during sleep, we devised a novel approach to measuring the critical pressure (Pcrit) within a single breath in tracheostomized sleep apnea patients. We hypothesized that the UA continuously modulates airflow dynamics during transtracheal insufflation. In this study, we examine tidal pressure-flow relationships throughout the respiratory cycle to compare phasic differences in UA collapsibility between closure and reopening. Five apneic subjects (with tracheostomy) were recruited (2 men, 3 women; 18-50 yr; 20-35 kg/m2; apnea-hypopnea index >20) for this polysomnographic study. Outgoing airflow through the UA (face mask pneumotachograph) and tracheal pressure were recorded during brief transtracheal administration of insufflated airflow via a catheter. Pressure-flow relationships were generated from deflation (approaching Pcrit) and inflation (after Pcrit) of the UA during non-rapid eye movement sleep. During each breath, UA function was described by a pressure-flow relationship that defined the collapsibility (Pcrit) and upstream resistance (Rus). UA characteristics were examined in the presence and absence of complete UA occlusion. We demonstrated that Pcrit and Rus changed dynamically throughout the respiratory cycle. The UA closing pressure (4.4 +/- 2.0 cm H2O) was significantly lower than the opening pressure (10.8 +/- 2.4 cm H2O). Rus was higher for deflation (18.1 +/- 2.4 cm H2O x l(-1) x s) than during inflation (7.5 +/- 1.9 cm H2O x l(-1) x s) of the UA. Preventing occlusion decreases UA pressure-flow loop hysteresis by approximately 4 cm H2O. These findings indicate that UA collapsibility varies dynamically throughout the respiratory cycle and that both local mechanical and neuromuscular factors may be responsible for this dynamic modulation of UA function during sleep.


Subject(s)
Pharynx/physiopathology , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/physiopathology , Sleep , Trachea/physiopathology , Work of Breathing/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Airway Resistance/physiology , Female , Humans , Insufflation/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Polysomnography , Positive-Pressure Respiration , Pressure , Respiratory Mechanics/physiology , Tracheostomy
4.
Sleep ; 25(3): 307-14, 2002 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12003161

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Daytime sleepiness is common in patients with sleep-disordered breathing. Although respiratory events during sleep are associated with the occurrence of daytime sleepiness, the differential impact of these events during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep on daytime sleepiness has not been well characterized. STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of respiratory events during REM sleep and NREM sleep on daytime sleepiness, as assessed by the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: University-based sleep disorders laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Patients referred for polysomnography and daytime MSLT (n=1,821). INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The study sample was initially divided into quartiles based on the level of the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) during NREM sleep. Within the first NREM-AHI quartile (NREM-AHI < 8.3 events/hr), the association between REM-related respiratory events and daytime sleepiness was examined using the method of Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression. After adjusting for age, gender, body mass index, and the duration of NREM and REM sleep, REM-AHI was not associated with daytime sleepiness (Relative Risk: 1.01; 95%CI: 0.94-1.10). Similarly, no significant association was observed between REM-AHI and the MSLT in patients within the second through fourth NREM-AHI quartiles. In contrast, increasing severity of disordered breathing during NREM sleep was associated with daytime sleepiness. For a 10-point increase in NREM-AHI, the adjusted relative risks for daytime sleepiness in the second through fourth NREM-AHI quartile were 1.21 (95%CI: 1.01-1.46), 1.20 (95%CI: 1.05-1.37), and 1.10 (95%CI: 1.04-1.16), respectively. CONCLUSION: Sleep-disordered breathing during NREM sleep, but not REM sleep, is associated with increased risk of daytime sleepiness.


Subject(s)
Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/complications , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/complications , Sleep, REM/physiology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/diagnosis , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Polysomnography , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/diagnosis , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...